"I work in the software industry so I can (A) solve problems that annoy me, and (B) make money on which to live," Frank writes. "While I respect the GPL and Open Source movements, I believe that commercial software is a necessary and important part of the ecosystem -- however NOT at the expense of the above basic freedoms. The iTunes App Store distribution model mangles almost every one of those tenets in some way, which is exasperating to me."

Read his blog for complete details on his grievances. However, vendor's rights must also be considered. In Apple's case, if they're marketing a product/ecosystem where they happen to also be marketing some security to the general masses, part of that security has to include the ability for them to filter out potentially harmful applications from their device/ecosystem. Apple makes the whole widget from beginning to end, which is part of their strength and weakness. If a guy wants a platform where there are no restrictions, there's Linux, in general, and the new Android-based phone in particular.

That said, I disagree with Apple's removal of the goofy "I Am Rich" application. It didn't violate any terms that Apple had set up. What Apple should have done is to disable the one-click step for that application and any more like it, and place an alert screen between the intent to purchase and the actual purchase. The alert would serve as extra warning and information about exactly what users are preparing to purchase. In fact, such an approach could go further. If an application has sufficient feedback with very low ratings, then the warning could be used to alert people that they are about to purchase a very poorly received application. Then, if they purchase it, it will have been done so with a little more thought.

(Thanks to my Macsimum compadre, J. Scott Anderson, for his help with today's column.)

"Macsimum News" is a proud supporter of Planet Gumbo, which feeds the hungry. We urge you to help them in their efforts.